Comments on: Judge says description of sheriff’s deputy as a ‘fascist’ was ‘accurate’ http://www.heatcity.org/2009/12/judge-says-description-of-sheriffs-deputy-as-a-fascist-was-accurate.html Hard news in the public interest from metro Phoenix Fri, 20 Jan 2012 05:12:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 By: The Crybaby Thugs of Maricopa County « LewRockwell.com Blog http://www.heatcity.org/2009/12/judge-says-description-of-sheriffs-deputy-as-a-fascist-was-accurate.html/comment-page-1#comment-240 The Crybaby Thugs of Maricopa County « LewRockwell.com Blog Thu, 03 Dec 2009 09:11:02 +0000 http://www.heatcity.org/?p=784#comment-240 [...] the support of his Dear Leader, the oleaginous proto-fascist named Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Stoddard defied the court order. Doubtless perceiving himself to be a [...] [...] the support of his Dear Leader, the oleaginous proto-fascist named Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Stoddard defied the court order. Doubtless perceiving himself to be a [...]

]]> By: StormAZ http://www.heatcity.org/2009/12/judge-says-description-of-sheriffs-deputy-as-a-fascist-was-accurate.html/comment-page-1#comment-222 StormAZ Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:06:17 +0000 http://www.heatcity.org/?p=784#comment-222 I'm not sure I understand your point. Are you saying that these activists should only have addressed Congress, not spoken up at a public meeting? From what I've read they were arrested for clapping and cheering each other. What made the arrest so egregious was that those applauding FOR speakers supporting the MCSO were not arrested. <br><br>And that's the biggest complaint against how Sheriff Joe does buisness. He's very selective in how he applies and enforces the law. I'm not sure I understand your point. Are you saying that these activists should only have addressed Congress, not spoken up at a public meeting? From what I've read they were arrested for clapping and cheering each other. What made the arrest so egregious was that those applauding FOR speakers supporting the MCSO were not arrested.

And that's the biggest complaint against how Sheriff Joe does buisness. He's very selective in how he applies and enforces the law.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.heatcity.org/2009/12/judge-says-description-of-sheriffs-deputy-as-a-fascist-was-accurate.html/comment-page-1#comment-793 Anonymous Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:06:00 +0000 http://www.heatcity.org/?p=784#comment-793 I'm not sure I understand your point. Are you saying that these activists should only have addressed Congress, not spoken up at a public meeting? From what I've read they were arrested for clapping and cheering each other. What made the arrest so egregious was that those applauding FOR speakers supporting the MCSO were not arrested. And that's the biggest complaint against how Sheriff Joe does business. He's very selective in how he and his minions apply and enforce the law. I’m not sure I understand your point. Are you saying that these activists should only have addressed Congress, not spoken up at a public meeting? From what I’ve read they were arrested for clapping and cheering each other. What made the arrest so egregious was that those applauding FOR speakers supporting the MCSO were not arrested.

And that’s the biggest complaint against how Sheriff Joe does business. He’s very selective in how he and his minions apply and enforce the law.

]]> By: kerease http://www.heatcity.org/2009/12/judge-says-description-of-sheriffs-deputy-as-a-fascist-was-accurate.html/comment-page-1#comment-207 kerease Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:00:36 +0000 http://www.heatcity.org/?p=784#comment-207 The law states that it is illegal to enter the country as an illegal immigrant. So how does one reconcile the fact that any law enforcement officer is in the wrong for removing or arresting illegals? As to first amendment rights, citizens of the United States definitely have the right to voice their opinion without being arrested. They have the right to solicity a change in the law by using the Congress to change the laws. But, until the law is changed, law enforcement needs to stop the flow of illegals. The law states that it is illegal to enter the country as an illegal immigrant. So how does one reconcile the fact that any law enforcement officer is in the wrong for removing or arresting illegals? As to first amendment rights, citizens of the United States definitely have the right to voice their opinion without being arrested. They have the right to solicity a change in the law by using the Congress to change the laws. But, until the law is changed, law enforcement needs to stop the flow of illegals.

]]>